Posts tonen met het label European Parliament. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label European Parliament. Alle posts tonen

donderdag 25 juli 2013

SUMMER OF EU REFORM: MAKING THE EU MORE TRANSPARENT

SUMMER OF EU REFORM

The European Parliament is on recess and most of the Commission civil servants are somewhere in their native countries. The summer is a great moment to lay on the beach and think about the next Treaty change, and what should be in it. The whole of summer I will blog about reform options of the EU. Some of the ideas will be radical, others will be more incremental. To kick it off I will grab the bull by its horns

Article 11 of the Lissabon Treaty 
The institutions shall, by appropriate means, give citizens and representative associations the 

opportunity to make known and publicly exchange their views in all areas of Union action


How to make the EU more transparent.

Roll call voting in the Parliament Committee’s

At this moment roll call votes or electronic voting is not possible in the European Parliament committee's. Meaning that after voting has taken place there isn't a registration showing who exactly voted in which way. In this way we cannot hold individual MEP's accountable for their voting paterns in the EP Committee's. Because committee's have such a great influence on the decisive vote in the plenary, transparency would benefit a great deal if we knew the individual positions of members of parliament in the individual committee's. An effort by the British MEP Andrew Duff to change this was rejected by the EP constitutional affairs committee. Some MEP's argued that it would be technically difficult to implement, which of course is baloney.



Limit trialogues

Before Lissabon, trialogues were something reserved for the final stages of the co-decision process. If the first reading and second reading failed, council, commission and parliament would enter into trialogues in the last stage to make ammends.Nowadays, 58% of all legislation is finished by first reading, meaning that a lot of decision making is made during trialogue meetings before the piece of legislation even gets to the first reading vote. While it is understandable that for complex issues or controversiel issues it is easier to reach a compromise behind close doors, trialogues kill public debate and make it very difficult to scrutinize individuals MEP's. 


Dualism; True seperation of the exective and the legislative 

While limiting trialogues will surely improve transperency, it would only be treating the symptoms of a much larger problem; the fact that in Brussels, informal processes grreatly hamper the seperation of powers. Because MEP's, political advisors are in constant contact with the Commission or Council services, public debates are rendered useless. In fact public debates in committee meetings are used to sum up what is agreed behind closed doors, not to have a hounest debate. If Brussels is serious about transperency it should take the Dutch example, where civil servants are forbidden to talk to Members of Parliament and vice versa.  

Bring back the e-mails!

While I still can use the WHO is WHO in the EU directory, I think it is a serious setback to democracy that the European Parliament deleted the email adresses of the MEP's from their profile page. While serious lobbyists and interest representatives will already have all the MEP' emails (and of their assistants) , ordinary citizens will have a more difficult time to contact "their" member of parliament. 

Article 10 Lisbon Treaty 
Every citizen shall have the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union. Decisions 
shall be taken as openly and as closely as possible to the citizen. 

zondag 30 juni 2013

De Unie in WEEK 27


Week 26 is een spannende week. Croatie wordt, lid, Litouwen wordt voorzitter en het Europees Parlement stemt over een aantal belangrijke zaken.


 In Straatsburg zal het Europees Parlement stemmen over een aantal belangrijke zaken zoals;

  • Backloading ETS: Een amendement om CO2 rechten te onthouden om de prijs van emmissierechten te doen stijgen. 
  • MFK: het Europees Parlement stemt over het gesloten akkoord tussen raad en parlement op het meerjarig financieel kader.
  • Vorige week sloten onderhandelaars van het Parlement en de Raad een akkoord over het MFK. Hierover zal op dinsdag in Straatsburg gestemd worden. Echter op vrijdag was de definitieve tekst van het akkoord nog niet beschikbaar. Er staan uiteraard nog een aantal andere zaken op de agenda.Het Parlement ook stemmen wie de nieuwe Europese Ombudsman wordt. In de running zijn twee Nederlanders; Ria Oomen en  de huidige Nederlandse Ombudsman Alex Brenninkmeijer. 
Naast de bovenstaande stemmingen zal er gedebatteerd worden over rapporten aangaande de registratie van voertuigen geimporteerd uit andere lidstaten, het rapport over Havendiensten en het rapport van Bartolozzi over de Bioeconomie.

Ook niet geheel onbelangrijk is een verslag over hoe Europa moet reageren op de verhoging van import-accijnsen die Noorwegen onlangs heeft ingevoerd.

Deze week neemt Litouwen het voorzitterschap over. Een idee van hun prioriteiten kan men hier vinden;

http://www.eu2013.lt/en/presidency-and-eu/programme-and-priorities


Vooruitblik op week 28

Week 10 is een Commissie week in het Europees Parlement.De meeste Commissies komen bijeen omdat het de laatste Commissie bijeenkomsten zijn voor het reces.


zaterdag 23 juni 2012

Organizing an awesome event in Brussels


For your convenience this post is available in a reader-friendly PDF file

When I started as an interest representative in Brussels, I had no idea that organizing events and meetings would be such a big part of the job. Indeed, organizing an event is one of the great ways of reaching out to policymakers, introducing your ideas or connecting to the right people. However, organizing an event in Brussels can be stressful to a point that it becomes a nightmare. I have organized numerous meetings and events in Brussels and decided to write this manual so that everyone can now make an awesome event!

Chronology of Actions
Here is a very brief overview of actions you will need to do to organize your event. At the minimum you will need six weeks to organize an event. I have organized succesfull meetings and events within a matter of weeks (my personal record is 7 days), but those were exceptions. If you want to be sure that you have enough time, six weeks is an absolute minimum. First you need to pick a date. Without a date, you can’t arrange anything. After you set the date find a location. Third, work out the concept; will you have a panel discussion or a network event. This concept doesn’t need to be clear from the start. You can fine tune it as you go. After you have the location and date, try to work out most logistics like catering and arranging a moderator. It is usually these things that are left to the end because they seem easy to arrange. This is true, but because they are relatively simple to arrange, deal with them in the beginning so that you don’t have to deal with them in the last minute when you need all your time for crisis-management. Arrange the speakers as soon as possible. Agenda’s fill up quite fast so as soon as you know what your concept is start with approaching speakers. Then deal with invitations. Send a “save the date” as soon as you know the location and time. Send the official invitations, at the minimum three weeks before your event. I personally don’t like to send reminders because they look desperate. When organizing an event in Brussels, I never sent printed invitations. Instead I always used email. Not only is it more cost-efficient, but respondents only had to reply to the email to sign up. Lastly, promote your event.

Setting the date for your event

Picking the date is without doubt the most crucial steps when organizing an event in Brussels. While you will never able to tell with certainty that you have chosen a good date (I think there is no such thing as the perfect date), there are a couple of rules and principles that you need to keep in mind. The European Parliament resided more or less once a month in Strasbourg, so needless to say that you should avoid this week. Another bad week is the so called “constituency weeks”, where Members of the European Parliament go back to their countries to speak to their constituencies. These weeks occur around 6 times a year. In general, forget about organizing something on Fridays. I always avoid organizing things on Friday because most Parliamentarians are gone, and a lot of people in the Brussels bubble leave town. Some say that for the same reason Thursday-evening is a bad day, but my experience is that Thursday evening is perfectly viable. Another thing to take into consideration is that the College of European Commissioners usually gets together on Wednesday. So if you would like to involve a European Commissioner this might be a good day. Ironically this is also the plenary day of the Flemish Parliament, so forget about inviting members of the Flemish Parliament.
Taking all the above into account, it is easy to imagine that there aren’t actually many good dates throughout the year. Maybe only a handful. To make things worse you will not be the only one that is searching for a suitable date. That is why there are some days throughout the year where 10 or 20 different events are organized in one day. Therefore it is very important to know what other events are going on, so that you don’t compete with similar or more pressing events. In October for example there is the regional Open Days where all the European regions organize events. Unless you are a region, this is a terrible week to organize something. Sometimes it is good to organize on a day that everyone else avoids. I organized an event on the day the Commission was presenting its proposal for a multi-annual budget. Since no-one thought this to be a good idea, it was almost the only event of the day.

Location, location, location

Together with the date, having the right location is one of the most important, if not thé most important thing to consider when organizing an event. What location you should have really depends on what kind of event you are organizing. I will start explaining where and why to organize smaller events (10-50 persons), and afterwards will share some insights about bigger events (+100 persons) A breakfast or a lunch meeting are ideal to speak to policymakers while respecting their time. Everyone has to eat at some point in the day, why not mix business and pleasure. One absolute requirement is that it isshort and relevant. If a lunchevent lasts longer that promised you mess up the agendas of the guests, making them regret they signed up for the lunchevent. Breakfast meetings are tricky. In theory they should start before work starts, but actually rarely do. One drawback is that I noticed that stakeholders send their interns and stagairs to attend them. Organizations like the European Policy Center have successful meetings in the early morning, but they have the clout and reputation to pull it off. Here are a couple of places which are ideal to organize lunch or breakfast meetings. The Stanhope hotel is a lovely, posh boutique hotel with a couple of meeting rooms. Rooms like the Wellington serve perfectly for smaller, intimate lunch meeting. If you prefer to have a meeting more closely to the Berlaymont instead of the Parliament. Martin’s Central Park also offers a couple of meeting rooms, and moreover they are also sometimes willing to close certain parts of the Icones Restaurant for groups. Moreover they have a great garden, which can also be used for lunch meetings. Hotel Rennaisance also offers good value for money, moreover it is very nearby the European Parliament. Then there are a couple of options which are not so accessible because you need someone to “get you in”. The European Parliament has a couple of member saloons which are ideal for organizing smaller meetings. However you will need to persuade a MEP to support your event because only MEP’s can reserve space in the European Parliament. The same goes for the Warande. The Warande is a true gem, a lovely space in the heart of Brussels. However since the Warande belongs to the society of Flemish people in Brussels, you need to know someone who is Flemish, and is a member of the society to help you book a room. In my opinion the Warande is a little bit on the expensive side.
When it comes to bigger events, Brussels houses some top notch locations. One of my favorite is Bibliotheque Solvay. It is located very near the Parliament, and in general you don’t need to worry about giving directions as most of the Brussels crowd knows where it is. Bibliotheque Solvay has a rich decor of precious wood, mosaics and stained glass windows, all covered by a large glass roof, which gives it a feel of prestige and luxury. On a similar note is Concert Noble, charm of a location located in the heart of the European quarter, it boasts a beautiful ballroom, giving it a feel of splendor. A bit out of the way is the Claridge. The Claridge is located near Madau and would certainly not be mentioned were it not for their unique Digital Wallpaper, giving you the opportunity to give your presentation on all walls of the venue. Some people like the Museum of Natural Sciences, because it is located near the Parliament, and sitting alongside dinosaurs is something special. However, mind that they oblige you to work with their caterers and moreover charge you also for the chairs people sit on. I personally prefer when venues give me a total price upfront instead that I have to pay for each single service individually. Also a bit out of the way of the European quarter is the Munt, the old Opera House of Brussels. I like the Munt because the location is relatively cheap and moreover quite flexible concerning what you can do with decorations and stuff. If you are organizing something for a young crowd Area 42 is an interesting alternative. It isn’t in the European quarter but the location is very modern and funky and you can really let your creativity run wild. Then there are a couple of public buildings which are also for rent. The Flemish Parliament has some meeting rooms for rent, but also a space for events like the Schelp. And then there is of course the European Parliament. The
Yehudi MENUHIN room is usually used when you also have a concert or music during your event. Again, you will need an MEP to get this space. Moreover, because of its popularity and technical requirements, you will need to plan something at least six months up front if you want to organize something in the Yehudi MENUHIN hall.

Logistics-stuff

When organizing an event, you have to think of a lot more than just the location and the date. Re-run in your head all the things that are going to be needed for the event, and what can go wrong. Will people arrive by car or on foot? Will you have to direct them to a parking? Is all the physical infrastructure like chairs and lighting present at the location or will you need to rent something? Personally I have worked with Design4Rent and I am satisfied with their services.  For more practical stuff like stages I worked with Festi. For flowers, I like to work with Schuman Flowers. A lot of people no’t know, but apart from their flower-stand they also deliver for events.

Catering

Whether for the welcome-drink or the network cocktail, when organizing an event, you will have to have some kind of catering. Because there is no catering with which I am 100% satisfied, I decided not to give any suggestion for the time being. But please email me if you have any great suggestions!

Moderator

If you are organizing a bigger event, you might want to hire a moderator or someone who hosts the event. Be aware that this person can make or break your event. I wished I had a list here with good moderators, but it really depends on the event and more importantly on the audience. If you have the budget go for moderators that are famous persons, as this attracts crowd by itself. Another no-brainer is that the person actually knows something about the topic. If the person is passionate about the interest you convey, it will make the event all the much better. In the other extreme if the moderator has no knowledge of the matter at hand, he will make silly mistakes and it will suck out the life of the party.

Arranging speakers

When organizing a public affairs event in Brussels, you will probably arrange some speakers. Some speakers will not have to be arranged because they are either part of your public affairs network or your internal organizations. But if you are asking MEP’s, European Commission officials or other to speak here is some advice, in order to make sure they agree to come, and actually show up. Members of the European Parliament or notorious for cancelling, arriving late and leaving early. To be sure that a MEP agree to come to your event there are a couple of things to keep in mind. First, instead if it is an electorate week (green week) MEP’s don’t like to travel. So your event will need to be near the Parliament if not in the Parliament. Secondly, MEP’s don’t like to share the spotlight. Asking more MEP can raise the profile of your event, but it can also be the reason for the cancellation of some MEP’s. So while it is certainly not forbidden, you will have to know how a MEP will react to other MEP’s being present. Time is of course important; don’t organize anything during the actual committee meetings of MEP’s or during voting time. In order to create commitment request for a meeting with the MEP to brief him/her about the event and his or her role in it. Finally, put the MEP in the spotlight. Arrange an interview before or after the event, and make sure that the MEP has his 5 minutes of fame to convey his political message.
Arranging a European Commissionaire is quite tricky. They have little time, and are very picky about what event to go to. In all honesty I have arranged (and failed to arrange) a couple of European Commissionaires, but still I can’t say exactly what was the main reason for my success or failure. Here are some humble tips anyway. Announce to the secretary by telephone that an invitation is coming s coming. This will create a mental note for the secretary or personal assistant. I have had a few instances that I never got a reply. The assistants receive hundreds of emails every day and they will probably forget to respond to one or two. Therefore it is important to make this mental-post it. Make sure that the invitation is relevant to the Commissionaires portfolio. After you have sent the invitation, don’t hesitate to call the secretary again to see if she has received it and to ask when you can expect a reply. After this it is up to the Commissionaire to decide if he wants to come to your event. Of course things like the profile of the event, and the presence of media will help your chances.

Concept

Not to be under-estimated is the concept of your event. 90 % of all the events in Brussels are panel-debates. If you do not invest time, creativity and effort your event run the danger of being remembered as boring. Because in Brussels you operate in a administrative-political environment, there are limitations on what you can do. The Brussels crowd likes to be entertained but not to be humiliated or made fun of. So a moderator can be challenging, but can’t go over the edge. One way it to re-shape your panel debates into something more fun. You can make it look like a TV-show. I heard of a debate inside a boxing-ring. One consultancy sent out invitations in the form of airplaine-boarding tickets. During one event I visited, there was a fashion-show. For this reason, organizers often also give gifts to guest when they leave. At the yearly KPN event guests were given Moleskine notebooks. I operated once on a low budget, but I still wanted to give something as a parting-gift. So we came up with the idea to give Sunflowers to all guests. They absolutely loved it! You need to have this twist to your event to separate it from competing events, and more importantly to be remembered. One of the reasons you are organizing this event is to convey a political message that “sticks”. So you don’t want to organize something that is easily forgotten, or worse; remembered as a failure. 


Promoting your event


Finaly, you will also have to do some promotion of your event. This is not only so you draw more crowd to your event. This is only part of why you prmote your event. By promoting your event, you are also promoting the political message that is enshrined in your event. So no opportunity should be missed to promote both your event as well as your message. I always post my event on the European Agenda. Moreover I use various groups on linkedin. Apart from promotion before the event happens, make sure you also do some after-promotion. This ranges from making a press release to summing up the conclusions of the event. Also you can have a dedicated website with all the fotographs of the event. You can even mention the event months later, in publications or speaches, in order to give it the air of a "landmark" event. You can prmote your event for free in the European Agenda. For me the site is a proven way of reaching the Brussels crowd. If you are Dutch you might also want to put your website on the Agenda of Europa-NU. 



vrijdag 13 april 2012

Why aren't MEP's reading your letters?

Lobbying the EU seems inviting af first. Indeed all the MEP's have their contact-details posted on their website, and getting in touch with a policymaker seems like just an email away. So you start writing letters to MEP's and to your surprise they aren't getting back to you. After a while you are starte to wonder what you are doing wrong. Here is a small but not exhaustive list of why MEP's aren't responding to your letters/e-mails. 


They simply haven't yet read your email.

MEP's sometimes receive hundreds of emails a day. These emails are filtered by their assistants, but even these busy bees can't handle the workload to cover everything. What you could do is call the assistents of the MEP and ask them if they have received the mail. This will make sure you at least know they have received it and bump it  up in their unconscious list of letters to watch out for. If it something rather important (but I am mean really important, because in principle everything is important) what you could do is announce that you are going to write a letter. Call the assistant, ask them if they would rather receive the letter on their own email instead of the MEP's and explain in two sentences what the letter is about.

Wrong time, wrong place, wrong MEP: Your letter is irrelevant

Most of the letters and emails that MEP's receive are to inform them about a certain stake, project or region without asking them for direct and concrete action. All these letters end up in the trash bin. The same goes when you write them a letter asking them for their support but the MEP is not in the position (the right committee, or the right moment in the policy process) to help you. Don't expect an MEP to write you back if youre issue is already a lost battle. So ideally, you write to the MEP who is in the right committee to help you, at a moment when it actually matters.

Barking up the wrong tree: the MEP has opposing views of what you are asking from him

Are you sure the MEP is actually in favor of what you are asking from him? A little background check wouldnt hurt. An extreme example would be asking for support for nuclear power from a Green MEP. But every single case will have to be politically in line with the political values of the MEP, and to some extent of his political family. One way to check is by looking at votewatch,eu to see how the MEP or his political party voted on the issue in the past. Or simply do a background check by looking at his website or other resources.

You don't have the (political) clout

When a issue becomes "hot", the whole of Europe wil start contacting a handfull of MEP's. The MEP will then have to decide who to listen to to. He certainly won't be able to listen to each and every lobbyist or interest group calling him. What ussually hapens is that he makes a selection of "opinion leaders" on the issue. These opinion leaders range grom experts to political heavyweights. On the Common Agriculture Policy these could involve world class Universities like Wageningen but also interest groups like COPA-COGECA. All the small players will be disregarded (I am exagerating a bit). So if you want your voice to be heard in the midst of the battle, you should make sure you "bring a friend"which has the attention of the MEP. In case that you do not have the political weight to throw around, you should at least be an expert int he field.

General recommendations

There is nothing worst then having problems to acces a policymaker when you have a immediate and pressing issue. One thing you did wrong from the start is that the MEP apparently doesn't know you well enough to give you 5 minutes of his time. Therefore you should invest in buidling a relationship with an MEP (and just as important with his assistants) even before you have an issue. Seconly, pay great attention to detail. Is the letter you wrote personalized in order to make it relevant for the MEP you are adressing. You can forget about mass-mailings, they are only effective in hurting your reputation. Thirdly, make someone with political clout contacts the MEP. Lobbyists are the weakest pieces on the EU chessboard, its far more better when an CEO, a local politician or a ambssador contacts an MEP.


vrijdag 3 februari 2012

Written Declarations

Written Declarations 

So what are they?

Written Declarations are a bit of an odd instrument that the European Parliament can use. Basically it is a text of a maximum of 200 words on a matter falling within the European Union’s sphere of activities. Written declarations are printed in all the official languages, distributed and entered in a register. MEPs can use written declarations to launch or relaunch a debate on a subject that comes within the EU’s remit. In order for a Written Declaration to be passed, half of the Parliament needs to have signed it. This sometimes creates funny little campaigns and campaignteams within the EP-buildings. However some MEP Assistants find them quite annoying.

What are they not?

Rule 12 of the written procedures explicitly says that the contents of a written declaration may not go beyond the form of a declaration and may not, in particular, contain any decision on matters for which specific procedures and competences are laid down in these Rules of Procedure. For legislations this is obvious, however sometimes the difference between a Parliament resolution and a Written declaration becomes murky especially when it touched on Human Rights or Foreign Policy. It goes without saying though that Resolutions trump Declarations, i.e are more stronger measures of conveying a message.

How are written declarations adopted? 
  • A group of up to five MEPs can submit a written declaration by presenting a text to be signed by their colleagues.
  • If the declaration is signed by a majority of the MEPs, it is forwarded to the President, who announces it in plenary.
  • At the end of the part-session, the declaration is forwarded to the institutions named in the text, together with the names of the signatories.
  • It is included in the minutes of the sitting at which it is announced.
  • Publication in the minutes closes the procedure.
How can written declarations further my advocacy or my case? 

Written declaration do not have the political soft-power that resolutions have. They have however great agenda-setting or exposure potential. If a written declaration is circulated heavily and brought under the attention of a lot of MEP's, it is certainly a good tool to "market" an issue. This is even more so if there is a signigicant amount of MEP supporting the declaration. Then the written declaration can be used to gain moment for agenda-setting. Another thing that written declaration do is that they anchor positions of MEP, which you can refer to in future dealings. 

Examples of written declarations



zondag 18 december 2011

European Parliament Intergroups


Intergroups


What are they?

Intergroups are ways to share views on cross-cutting issues or very specific issues between MEP’s from diferent political groups and civil society. Normal committee’s of the European Parliament are somewha limited because they don’t deal with issues which are a cross-cutting like for example energy issues at ports (is this something for the ITRE Committee or the TREN committee?). The European Parliament Intergroup on Climate Change, Biodiversity and Sustainable Development is a good example of an intergroup that is cutting across various policy areas. Other Intergroups focus on very specific topics. Examples of these very focused Intergroups are the Intergroup on Youth, the Intergroup on Tibet, and the Intergroup on the Sahara. In short Intergroups are platforms for MEP's to discuss cross-cutting issues /specific issues amongst different political families and the civil society.  

What are they not?

Inter-groups are informal groups within the European Parliament which consist of members of the European Parliament and members of civil society. It is important to know that while the rules of procedure govern the establishment and functioning of the Intergroups, they are not Parliament bodies and therefore may not express Parliament’s opinion. Moreover, they may not use the name nor the logo of the European Parliament nor any name which might lead to confusion with the official bodies of the European Parliament such as parliamentary committees, interparliamentary delegations and joint parliamentary committees. In addition, Intergroups may not undertake any activities which resemble the official activities of Parliament or of its bodies.

Why do Intergroups matter?

The strength of the Intergroup really depends on how active it is, and how involved the MEP’s are. Formally an Intergroup can’t take any position, nor can it vote on something, however Intergroups do have the power to bring something under the attention of key policymakers in the EU. By organizing meetings with MEP’s from different political groups they can turn the attention of the MEP’s to a subject which was previously unknown. By inviting certain speakers to these meetings they can signal in certain views on a matter. They also are powerfull enough to invite Commissionairs for an exchange of views. Also by simply having an Intergroup on on an issue signals that the European Parliament finds this issue important.


Examples of active Intergroups


The Intergroup on Climate change, biodiversity and sustainable development is run by the European Bureau for Conservation and Development. They organise debates on issues ranging from Aquaculture to the Greening of the CAP. Their succes lies in their tightly run secretariat, their knack of focusing on relevant topics and their ability to attract important speakers. 

List and information of all the intergroups


Sustainable Hunting, Biodiversity, Countryside Activities and Forests
Chair: Véronique Mathieu
List of members
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 




Name intergroup: Ways of Saint James / Caminos de Santiago
Chair: Francisco José Millán Mon
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 




Media 
Chair: Jean-Marie Cavada
List of members: 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Urban
Chair: Jan Olbrycht
List of members 
Website: www.urban-intergroup.eu 
Affiliated organisation: 


Public Services (SGI - SSGI)
Chair: Françoise Castex
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Trade Union
Chair: Alejandro Cercas
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Western Sahara
Chair: Norbert Neuser
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Tibet
Chair: Thomas Mann
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Disability
Chair: Ádám Kósa
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Traditional Minorities, National Communities and Languages
Chair: Kinga Gál and Carl Haglund
List of members: 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Mountains, Islands and Sparsely-Populated Regions
Chair: Bogusław Sonik
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Baltic-Europe
Chair: Tunne Kelam
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Rights - LGBT
Chair: Michael Cashman and Ulrike Lunacek
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Social Economy / Economie Sociale
Chair: Mario Mauro and Marc Tarabella
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Mers et Zones Côtières / Seas and Coastal Areas
Chair: Corinne Lepage
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 




Sky and Space / Ciel et Espace
Chair: Vittorio Prodi
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Anti-racisme & Diversity
Chair: Emine Bozkurt
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: ENAR: European Network Against Racism


Youth Issues / Jeunesse
Chair: Damien Abad
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: European Youth Forum 


Family and the Right of the Child & Bioethics
Chair: Anna Záborská, Miroslav Mikolášik and Margrete Auken
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 




Viticulture, Fruits et Legumes, Tradition et Alimentation de qualite
Chair: Astrid Lulling
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Welfare & conservation of animals
Chair: SCHLYTER Carl
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


SME "small and medium-sized enterprise"
Chair: KARAS Othmar
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Ageing and intergenerational solidarity
Chair: MORAES Claude, CABRNOCH Milan, GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES Cristina, LAMBERT Jean, LIOTARD Kartika Tamara, LYNNE Elizabeth, van NISTELROOIJ Lambert
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


Climate change, biodiversity and sustainable development / Changement climatique, biodiversité et développement durable
Chair: Struan Stevenson
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: European Bureau for Conservation and Development


Extreme poverty and human rights
Chair: MÉNDEZ DE VIGO Íñigo
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 


New media
Chair: Marietje Schaake
List of members 
Website: 
Affiliated organisation: 



























maandag 12 december 2011

EU Monitoring

Monitoring the EU Process.


You can download this page in pdf format


For people working in EU Affairs, monitoring EU policies is part of their daily routines. But before you become efficient and smart at it, you must first go through a lengthy learning process where you discover where to find the information and how to organize yourself. In this text we will explain how to organize yourself and where to find the information you need to stay on top of EU developments.

Organizing yourself.

Monitoring EU policies and legislation should be built-in to your daily routine. Ideally there are several moments when you commit yourself to plow through agenda's, newspapers and whatnot. It starts with your daily routine. In the morning (along with a cup of coffee) try to read the more general papers such as the Financial Times, Euractiv, Europolitics, the EUobserver. Then in the afternoon, check the Commissions EU Midday Express for latest news and speeches from Commissionaires. Speeches are not to be underestimated as they always reveal hints at future developments.

If it is a Committee Week drop by at the European Parliament to check what hearings are taking place at the EP. Posters are hanging on several walls indicating which hearing is taking place where. While you should already know this by looking at the websites of the political parties, my experience is that in general hearings are very poorly communicated, so nothing beats actually going to the EP to look at the poster (provided you have an entrance badge). At the end of the week (I always do this on Fridays) you should take a look ahead at the coming week. Especially look at plenary and Committee Agenda's. This is also a great moment to look at the agenda of the national parliament, as you can't totally ignore the national dimension.

If you want to makes sure you are involved at the very beginning of a policy process you should pay attention to green papers, white papers, consultations or other discussions that are taking place. These normally hint at serious EU activity on a subject in the future. Apart from these there is no substituting the periodical coffee or lunch with a European Commission civil servant. You can find their names and telephone numbers at European Commission the directory. The same goes for parliamentary assistants, political advisors of the parties and committee secretariats.

On a more strategic level there are a couple moments in the year which deserve your special attention. The European Commission publishes it's working program in November. This should be analyzed thoroughly (especially the Annexes). The same goes for the program of the Council Presidency, which is published right before a presidency starts. Don't only look at the priorities, also look at the various (informal) meetings which are going to take place during the presidency. Finally, the European Union has a EU Calender, where more relevant dates for the whole year can be found. I suggest to make every month a quarter forecast of the EU Calendar.

Here are all the link's again

Daily

Weekly

Monthly / Periodically
EU Calender

Yearly

zondag 20 november 2011

European Parliament Committee Secretariats

In order to function properly, The 736 members of the European Parliament can rely on Parliament officials at their disposal. The linguistic service and These civil servants of the European Parliament are appointed through the EPSO concourse and are expected to be neutral in their handlings. The Parliament has about 6000 officials in service, but one third are translators, the rest are clerks, administrators, assistants, secretaries and others. In this Blog we will zoom in on the support staff of the Parliamentary Committees.

The Parliamentary Committee can rely on a secretariat which consists of 5 to 10 persons. The secretariat is headed by a Secretary of the Committee. The responsibilities of the secretary of the Committee include appointing administrators to Committee Rapporteurs, handling incoming letters and forwarding them either to the Committee Chair or the Committee members and supporting the Committee Chair. Moreover the secretary of the Committee is responsible for drafting the agenda of the Committee. The agendas are made in close cooperation with Rapporteurs, chairs and members, but the role of the Committee secretary is not to be underestimated.

When an administrators is designated by the Committee secretary to a Rapporteur his main task is to facilitate and smooth out the process. This starts with talks between the Rapporteur and the administrator on the direction that the Rapporteur wants to take the rapport. A Rapporteur with a strong sense of direction and focus will rely less on the administrator then if opposite is the case. Moreover the role of the administrator will also depend on role the MEP gives his own assistant in the process. If the MEP has a strong sense of direction, backed by expertise and experience, the role of the administrator will be mainly administrative. If the MEP is new and lacks expertise the administrator will have a bigger role to play in the shaping of the rapport. What is a bit unclear is what the role of the political assistant of the political parties is. As the guardian of the groups political positions, he/she will probably want to have his/her say in the development of writing a EP rapport.

zondag 13 november 2011

How to write an EU Position Paper

How to write a Position Paper 

The position paper is the single most abused lobby instrument in Brussels. It is the most common tool used in the EU to make the position of your organization known with regards to a policy. Sadly, the last years position-papers have also had a negative effect on public affairs in Brussels. Firstly, public affairs amateurs use them too often and too one-dimensional. Indeed some people do nothing but write and send position-papers, thinking that this is what lobbying is all about. Secondly, it is not easy to write a good position paper. But instead of taking the time to make something worth reading, a lot of organizations copy paste entire strategies in position-papers, resulting in too long papers that no-one reads. This is a fair warning; don't write position papers just so you to feel good about yourself because you actually did something. Now thT we have that out of the way, lets see what makes a good position-paper? It needs to be;

  • Short
  • Easy to read
  • Informative and Anecdotal
  • Useful

Be an instant hero: Keep it short

Throughout this book, the word short will appear and reappear. It is the single most important advice I can give; Keep it short. Brussels is a place of abundance; there are a lot of restaurants, bars, cars, spa’s. The only thing which is in constant scarcity is time. Keeping it short will make you instantly liked. Your position paper should ideally be 1 or 2 pages. There are good position papers of 4 to 6 pages, but they really need to be gems containing great wisdom and sound advice. I have written a great number of position papers and I have ventured always to make them two pages. The best way to shorten your position paper is read it several times and delete any sentence that does not add any value to the message. Be utmost critical about each sentence. If you are working with more partners (organizations) on a position paper, make sure that everybody agrees that the mission is to make an attractive paper, and not to give stage to individual organizations to window-dress. Keep civil servants at bay when it comes to your paper, they tend to be afraid that something is left out resulting in whole strategies and policy-papers being copy-pasted into the document. Another good way to keep your paper short is by introducing the add-delete rule. Every time you (or someone else) add a sentence to a position paper, one sentence needs to be deleted.

Easy to Read-Structure and content of your position paper

Your position paper should be easy to read. As a general rule, it should have a clear and coherent structure. In position papers that I use in Brussels, I normally use the following order;



  1. Thanking the policymakers
  2. Stating your position
  3. Stating your arguments
  4. Provide an alternative
  5. Closing


Thanking the policymakers

I always start with thanking the policymaker for the opportunity to give input, or by commending them on the work they do on a specific policy issue. This is a big difference between lobbying in the national capitals or the U.S; In Brussels we are friendly. Unless you have a farmers lobby and you have the power to steamroll Brussels with thousands of tractors, I recommend you always strike a friendly albeit urgent tone in your position papers. You might reach newspapers with an angry tone, but that is all you will accomplish. The character trait of all successful lobbyist in Brussels is that they have a constructive approach when dealing with policymakers. They are always greeted in the offices of policymakers as welcome guests. This not only secures access, prevents damaged relationships, but also leaves the door open for future issues. So when in Rome, be like the Romans, when in Brussels, be friendly.

Stating your position
After you thanked the policymaker, the paper states the position in the most clear, unambiguous way, e.g “We are against the regulation of homemade jam”. Or; “we are for the introduction a European wide ban on animal-testing”. The position should leave no room for doubts on the position of your organisation on a certain issue.

Stating your arguments
Thirdly, a paragraph should be devoted to stating the arguments that underpin your position. Make sure you don’t exaggerate the facts or even worse lie. Your arguments should be based on sounds facts and figures. This does not mean that your arguments can’t be biased or coloured (after all, what information is not biased), but simply don’t do anything that undermines your credentials. If a politicians finds out your information is dodgy, he will stop using it in his daily work.

Provide an alternative.
This is typically a European element in lobbying. You should always provide alternative solutions that are also implementable and supported by a broad range of actors. Not only does this divert from the original plans of policymakers, but it also makes the lobbying process more manageable. After all, it is easier to work with an alternative that you propose or support.

Closing
Finally, close the position paper in a orderly manner, meaning that you don’t leave any open endings or untied knots. Except if you finish with a question which can sometimes serve as a powerful closing statement; “After all is food safety not a top-priority of the European Commission?” “Isn’t the European Commission committed to eradicating poverty in the world?” I personally like to end my position papers by summarizing the advices with numbered bulletpoints. At the top of the bulletpoints I put the header; 5 Recommendations to the European Commission.” This tends to stick and is easy to use as a reference.



Informative and Anecdotal

Make sure your position paper encompasses statements, figures and statistics which will help the policymaker in his discussions with his peers. This is not to say that your document should be full of nitty gritty numbers and graphs, but it should hold a couple of key elements which supports your case, and moreover can be used in a anecdotal fashion by the policymaker; 50 % of Serbian youth has never travelled out of the country”, “one in three car accidents involved alcohol.”

Useful

This sounds like a no-brainer but I think most of the position papers are actually not very useful. They hold information with no direct relevance to the issue and serve as window-dressing for either organizations or worse, for individual politicians and civil servants. Make sure that all the information of the position paper is useful, and has real added value in relation to what the policy paper is concerned with. Just as important is timing. You might send a position paper as a reaction to an on-going consultation, but in all other cases make sure the position paper arrives when it is needed most. For example when dealing with a member of parliament, you must make sure he gets the relevant information when a certain item is on the agenda within his committee, or during question hour with a Commissionaire or Minister. Don’t be afraid to remind them when they can use this; “In two weeks you will meet the state secretary……, feel free to use this document in your discussions”. Do not send position papers if you do not know when and how it might be used, you might as well throw your position paper in a bottomless well.

Summary
  • 1. Position papers are used too often en too one dimensiol, make sure you write and send one when you have a clear goal in mind, and the time and resources to guard the quality of the paper.
  • 2. A position paper needs to be short, easy to read, informative, anecdotal and last but not least usefull.
  • 3. Make sure your paper has a clear structure. One example is; thanking the policy makers, stating your position, use your arguments, provide a alternative and close.
  • 4. Write your paper so it can be easy copy-pasted.
  • 5. Make sure you deliver your positionpaper at a moment that it can be used.